I want to start by saying that my intention is not to target or criticize anyone or what they are doing. If my words come across in a way that makes anyone feel upset or uncomfortable, I sincerely apologize. I only wish to express my perspective on the rules because, due to them, some of us who participated in the contest feel excluded now.I'm sad to hear you guys feel that way.
I don't see any point in posting at least 4 updates where I'll just have something like
Campaign #1 - Spent $50 - Revenue $20 - Profit -$30
and repeat something like that 3 more times.
I like to focus on the process. If you remember my past PA FA:
I also used the similar approach, and it seems the members liked it.
In the end - members vote for FA-s and if they like it - you get the vote. So posting GIF-s about faking stuff just doesn't make sense.
@dood , I truly appreciate all the work you’ve done. Whether you believe it or not, I’m a big fan of yours. I’m only referring to the rules, which have been emphasized more this time with the creation of a PDF. I’m merely pointing out my thoughts on the rules mentioned, nothing personal at all
Don't get me wrong. You post the most comprehensive guides on the forum. I love everything you do here (and my GIF didn't mean anything).I'm sad to hear you guys feel that way.
I don't see any point in posting at least 4 updates where I'll just have something like
Campaign #1 - Spent $50 - Revenue $20 - Profit -$30
and repeat something like that 3 more times.
I like to focus on the process. If you remember my past PA FA:
I also used the similar approach, and it seems the members liked it.
In the end - members vote for FA-s and if they like it - you get the vote. So posting GIF-s about faking stuff just doesn't make sense.
At least dood follow along had effort like most of his work. I can't get salty for doods votes he is one of the backbones of this forum. But a lot of the other follow along that have lots of votes, its so obvious people cooking with eachother in the background and my guess is there will be money splitting. I find it very anti- sportsmanship and I ll most likely stop putting effort in my FAs or stop participating in contests in general.Don't get me wrong. You post the most comprehensive guides on the forum. I love everything you do here (and my GIF didn't mean anything).
I loved your previous PA FA but you posted only one update as to how your campaigns performed in this contest and I just felt it seemed a bit far-fetched that you're #1 in the poll (you're one of the most helpful persons on the forum, so I get it). What I meant is that the quality of FAs has reduced a lot since the last PA contest.
I think Luke should make one or more rules for this kind of competition to prevent some people from posting worthless content.At least dood follow along had effort like most of his work. I can't get salty for doods votes he is one of the backbones of this forum. But a lot of the other follow along that have lots of votes, its so obvious people cooking with eachother in the background and my guess is there will be money splitting. I find it very anti- sportsmanship and I ll most likely stop putting effort in my FAs or stop participating in contests in general.
I suppose you have to define “worthless” because as we know, people do not like to get disqualifiedI think Luke should make one or more rules for this kind of competition to prevent some people from posting worthless content.
In addition, I think a vote can be set up to select worthless posts and then disqualify them from participating. Of course, this may be a bit radical and may not be friendly to some forum members participating in the competition.
That means things have changed since then manI suppose you have to define “worthless” because as we know, people do not like to get disqualified
We have had rules before on how much you need to spend on your follow along and show it (example: spend $200 on the campaign and show a screenshot).
We’ve also run contests totaling $xxx,xxx in prizes and this is the first time there’s been any sort of conversation like this that I can remember.
The current voting results are indeed quite amusing.
Investigating if FA's votes are concentrated in the same GEO?
Yes, there is indeed no clear boundary for defining worthless content, so I would say this rule is relatively radical.I suppose you have to define “worthless” because as we know, people do not like to get disqualified
We have had rules before on how much you need to spend on your follow along and show it (example: spend $200 on the campaign and show a screenshot).
We’ve also run contests totaling $xxx,xxx in prizes and this is the first time there’s been any sort of conversation like this that I can remember.